3.30.2010

EHS as Leaders in Corporate Responsibility

A recent publication from the Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship contains information on the Center’s 2009 survey of 756 small, medium and large companies across the United States. The survey demonstrates the increasing importance of Corporate Citizenship, Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Social Responsibility (CC/CR/CSR) in organizations.

It is important for EHS Professions to track these issues.  I am seeing a growing number of companies where the EHS Function is being functionalized and/or marginalized by CC/CR/CSR efforts.  In these early stages of CC/CR/CSR formulation, there is the potential for diminished influence of the EHS Function.

Read More

3.26.2010

An Externalities Framework to Develop Sustainability and CSR Strategies

Since the 1987 Brundtland Report, which put sustainability on the business map, the Rio Conference in 1992 and its famous declaration, and the concept of a “triple bottom line” put forth by John Elkington in 1994, issues related to sustainability have expanded as a central topic in corporate boardrooms and business strategy. Along the way, sustainability ideas and concepts have morphed into the broader area of corporate responsibility (numerous terms are used to describe this: corporate citizenship, corporate social responsibility, and social responsibility).

As an important and rapidly evolving area, there is a wild-west quality to defining, executing, and measuring sustainability and CSR initiatives. Commonly identified sustainability issues include: reduction of energy use, carbon-generation, waste, etc. Some CSR norms, sustainability issues, child-labor issues, and good EHS practices have gained general acceptance—but CSR, especially, is still a very fluid area. The CSR (or SR) ISO activities (ISO 26000) might help, but it will take many years for this to fully flesh out. Read More

3.26.2010

Is Your EHS Audit Program Hitting The Mark?

Auditing is a difficult subject—the term rarely conjures pleasant thoughts, and it’s often a dreaded event for the auditee. For the EHS department, it is a complex endeavor, one that EHS professionals often don’t feel they fully have a handle on as they’re presented with issues of program validity and reliability. For internal audit programs in large companies, scheduling can be a nightmare, with auditors swamped by primary-non-audit duties. While EHS departments do complete their audits and generate reports for the C-Suite, Board of Directors, and External Third Parties, the EHS audit programs I’ve observed often miss the mark.

Some of the recent EHS audit program challenges I’ve observed include: (1) integrating EHS management system audits with existing compliance audits; (2) developing procedures to close the gap between EHS program/system upgrades and the audit tools measuring them; (3) training auditors how to audit the EHS management system; (4) identifying leading indicators that can shorten the audit process or be used in site/plant self-assessment activities. Read More

3.25.2010

Use of Causal Loop Diagrams in Building High Performance EHS Teams

I have worked with several EHS departments to increase their performance and cohesiveness. In partnership, we’ve addressed performance beyond simply meeting regulatory compliance, examining ways that they can integrate EHS deeper into the organization and impact sustainability and CSR. In all of these engagements, I have started by getting the EHS management system up-to-snuff and firing on all cylinders. Beyond the EHSMS, we then focused on:

  • Team vision: developing a strong vision based in the team’s collective wisdom.
  • Communication skills: strengthening internal and external communication and generating alignment.
  • Team learning: developing mechanisms for feedback, analysis, and integration.
  • Systems thinking: strengthened skills in systems ID and mapping.

Read More

3.19.2010

Aligning Strategy, Structure and Process with EHS

Due to increased uncertainty since the financial meltdown, companies have shrunk their strategic planning cycles, making it challenging to align internal structures and processes with changing strategies. EHS professionals have had to respond with greater flexibility and innovation in breaking down organizational silos to help generate alignment between strategy, structure, and process.

The recent issue of the McKinsey Quarterly included interviews with four corporate Chief Strategy Officers (CSOs). While the companies are diverse (Estee’ Lauder, Visa, Boeing, and Smith International) and the CSOs diverge on issues, there are several common points that EHS professionals should note. All of the CSOs discussed shrinking planning cycles—in many cases, what were once annual cycles are now quarterly or even monthly ones. They also echoed that business assumptions that once seemed indisputable are now coming into question. Read More

3.9.2010

The Power of Informal Networks

Challenged to achieve regulatory compliance, EHS professionals are always looking for beyond-compliance ways to reduce risk. As organizational models have evolved to push accountability away from corporate functions toward business units and process-specific operations, the role of EHS professionals has also morphed.

The trend has been for EHS professionals to act in the role of consultant or coach within the organization, as opposed to an enforcer to be avoided. While this trend makes sense, a significant component of EHS accountability still resides within the EHS department and its professionals.

Read More