12.19.2011

ISO 9001 User Survey Results Published

Results of the 2010-11 ISO User Survey are reported in the current issue (December, 2011) of ISO Focus+.    The survey was coordinated by TC 176, subcommittee SC2 and had 11,722 respondents from around the world.  The full survey can be downloaded from the ISO website.  Some of the findings that caught my attention follow.

Factors influencing certification.  The three largest drivers that influence the decision to pursue certification are: customer satisfaction (4,222); market need (3,689); and, mandated customer requirements (3,290).  These findings are consistent with what I have been seeing with my clients, in particular customer mandated requirements for integrated EHS management systems.

Important benefits of applying ISO 9001 in an organization.  Customer satisfaction was the top response (5,886) as would be expected with 9001.  Of interest is that many of the top responses also point to value with business process improvements, including: standard business process (5,821); increased management commitment (4,125); and more effective management reviews (3,975).

Read More

10.19.2011

Innovations in EHS Auditing – Breakout Session at the 19th Annual NAEM Forum

EHS auditing is a dynamic process that requires stakeholder input for success. Speakers emphasized this point during a breakout session at the 19th Annual NAEM Forum, which focused on the innovative practices that several companies are using to deliver maximum effectiveness and efficiency.

The speakers presented highlights from the recent International Audit Protocol Consortium’s survey on EHS audit practices: roughly 60 percent of respondents indicated a high rating for detecting regulatory non-compliance; 50 percent for management system conformance; 50 percent for benefit of audit results to the audited operation; and less than 50 percent for benefit to external stakeholders.

Read More

10.19.2011

EHS/S Management of Change (MOC) at the 19th Annual NAEM Forum

I attended an excellent session this afternoon at the 19th Annual NAEM Forum on management of change (MOC), during which speakers presented sound advice and insights regarding EHS/S MOC management issues. Some highlights are below.

There are various types of management of change. These commonly include changes in processes, regulations, personnel, locations (M&A), and priorities and attitudes. Read More

9.23.2011

Safety and Environmental Management Systems (SEMS) in Oil, Gas and Sulphur Operations – New Federal Rule

In the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon event in the Gulf of Mexico, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) has promulgated a regulation that requires operators of oil, gas, and sulphur in the Outer Continental Self to develop and implement a safety and environmental management system (SEMS).

The October 15, 2010 Federal Register announcement of this regulation indicates that the rule incorporates in its entirety and makes mandatory the American Petroleum Institute’s (API) Recommended Practice 75, “Development of a Safety and Environmental Management Program for Offshore Operations and Facilities.” The rule became effective on November 15, 2010. Read More

9.23.2011

EHS Management Systems and Off-Shore Drilling – Aftermath of the Montara and Macondo Accidents

In the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon (Macondo) oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and the Montara oil spill off the coast of Western Australia, ISO Technical Committee (TC) 67, which focuses on oil and gas issues, has developed an action plan to combat oil spill disasters. Published this past March, the action plan addresses many safety and health facets. Of particular interest is the TC’s proposal to develop an EHS management system standard devoted to this industry.

In the early 1990s, ISO/TC 67 developed a robust integrated EHS management system model. The TC suspended its development activities on the standard in anticipation of the publication of ISO 14001 in 1996 and the development of BS8800 in the UK.  Read More

9.15.2011

The Era of Transparency and a Mandatory Reporting Trajectory Point to the Need for a Strong Risk Management Framework

In the sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) “space” there is increasing pressure to report on triple-bottom-line issues through reporting frameworks, such as the GRI G3. There is a trajectory toward quasi-mandatory reporting by value-chain stakeholders and actual mandatory reporting by regulatory-bodies. Quasi-mandatory reporting is seen with the inclusion of GRI sustainability reporting as tracked by Bloomberg’s Index and other financial indices. Mandatory reporting is seen in South Africa, Denmark, and France. Read More

6.30.2011

Risk Management and Business Continuity with an Integrated Management System

In my previous post, I briefly discussed the integrated quality, safety, and environmental management system (QSEMS) at the Cannes Convention Center. The trend toward integrated management systems, including ISO’s movement toward a generic management system model for wide application, will provide a new tool for organizational risk management.

As evolved as risk management methods and models are, organizations struggle with integrating risk management practices. A silo phenomenon challenges risk managers as it has EHS managers for many years. In current non-financial risk management writings and research, the need for risk management integration and “silo-busting” is highlighted. An integrated risk management system can provide a way to bust silos in an organization. Read More

6.30.2011

Integrated Quality, Safety, and Environmental (QSE) Management System in the Hospitality and Convention Space

I have been seeing the increased use of integrated management systems in the hospitality and convention industries. While quality and environmental are most commonly combined, I was intrigued to see a report in the June 2011 issue of ISO Focus about the inclusion of health and safety in the Cannes Convention Center’s management system.

The Cannes Convention Center began to develop its integrated quality, safety, and environmental management system (QSEMS) in October 2008. The system incorporates ISO 9001, OHSAS 18001, and ISO 14001 and was certified in December 2009. With the integrated QSEMS in place, the center reports a reduction in its carbon footprint, a reduction in waste, and a reduction in water consumption. Read More

6.22.2011

ISO 50001 Just Published – “Energy Management Systems – Requirements with Guidance for Use”

The much anticipated ISO management system for energy management was published on June 15. The ISO 50001 format closely follows ISO 14001 on environmental management. I will be posting comments over the next couple of weeks regarding things I see in it and issues that will help with implementation and integration.

At first glance, where an ISO 14001 or OHSAS 18001 management system is in place, integration of ISO 50001 will be somewhat straightforward.

A unique piece for 50001 is section 4.4.3 that addresses “energy review.” This is the equivalent of environmental aspects in 14001 and risk assessment in 18001. While this standard is new and interpretations will be fleshed out in the coming months and years, the interpretation of “energy” may not be trivial when considering conformance with 50001. The way it is defined will impact how the energy review requirements will be met. Read More

5.23.2011

Publication of ISO 50001 – Energy Management System. Leverage for EHS/S Performance and Auditing

The May 2011 issue of ISO Focus+ announced that the much anticipated ISO management system for energy management will soon be published in 2011.

ISO reports that 50001 will specify requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an energy management system, whose purpose is to enable an organization to follow a systematic approach in achieving continual improvement of energy performance, including energy efficiency, energy use, and consumption. This standard will specify requirements applicable to energy use and consumption, including measurement, documentation, and reporting, design and procurement practices for equipment, systems, processes, and personnel that contribute to energy performance. ISO indicates that it applies to all variables affecting energy performance that can be monitored and influenced by the organization. Read More

Page 1 of 3123