11.2.2012

Generation Flux – Challenges and Opportunities

Generation Flux is a new distinction introduced in several recent Fast Company (FC) articles.  This notion builds on terms, such as, Gen X, Gen Y, and Millennials, used broadly to describe generational characteristics.  I learned about this evolving idea at the AIHA Fall Conference this past week in San Antonio.

This term, coined by FC’s editor, Robert Safian “is less a demographic designation than a psychographic one: What defines GenFlux is a mind-set that embraces instability, that tolerates – and even enjoys – recalibrating careers, business models, and assumptions.”  Safian’s articles provide an overview on how numerous large traditional organizations (e.g. Nike, GE) and newer, smaller start-ups are embracing Generation Flux.

Read More

11.2.2012

Boards and Risk Management

Increasing risk oversight is a priority of boards and management since the global financial crisis, but many are unprepared to do this according to a recent report from the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). A Framework for Board Oversight of Enterprise Risk presents a nine-step roadmap to help directors identify, understand and address enterprise risk and recognize potential compounding effects when risks collide.  The roadmap is sound and also can be a valuable resource for risk management professionals.

The CICA report states “a common concern among boards of directors is the lack of a comprehensive framework and toolsets to assist boards to structure an effective, robust risk oversight process.”  Key activities in the CICA framework include: identifying risks; analyzing, validating and prioritizing them; determining risk tolerance and risk appetite; managing risk through various response strategies; and ongoing monitoring.  These are similar to recommendations included in ISO’s risk management standard (31000) and their business continuity management system standard (22301). Read More

11.17.2010

Are You an EHS, Sustainability, or CSR Musician, Conductor, or Composer?

At the Pegasus Conference 2010: Systems Thinking in Action, held last week in Boston, several pioneers—including Daniel Kim, Robert Fritz, and Peter Senge—presented nuggets of wisdom for EHS, Sustainability, and CSR professionals. I’ve shared a few of them below.

Building upon the concepts he introduced in his groundbreaking book, The Path of Least Resistance—in which he presented his landmark model on the structural tension between vision and current reality—Fritz discussed the Structural Dynamics of Leadership.

The role of leaders, he said, is to change or alter the underlying structures that affect culture and behavior. This is important because structure is more causally dominant than individual talent, good intentions, past experiences, creativity, or capacity. The most effective leaders possess strength of character, are able to work with structural forces, and have the ability to create a shared vision and shared structural tension. Read More

11.16.2010

EHS, Sustainability, and CSR Professionals as Transformative 3rd-Generation Leaders

At the Pegasus Conference 2010: Systems Thinking in Action, held last week in Boston, several pioneers—including Daniel Kim, Robert Fritz, and Peter Senge—presented nuggets of wisdom for EHS, Sustainability, and CSR professionals. I’ve shared a few of them below.

Daniel Kim discussed what he calls “The 3rd-Generation Leadership Challenge.” Speaking generally about two eras—the industrial revolution era and the current “knowledge and learning” era—he characterized the evolution of leadership as having two generations in the industrial revolution (Pioneer- and Manager-Leaders) and four leadership options in the current era (which he refers to as 3rd-Generation Leadership: Parasite-, Operator-, Stagnant-, Learning/Transformative-Leaders). Read More

11.12.2010

Characteristics of Corporate Environmental Sustainability Practices

A robust study[1] of corporate sustainability practices as been conducted by Cowan et al. The authors correctly indicate that there is a void in standardized approaches in this area, with many companies relying on guidance or criteria set forth by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), in ISO standards such as 14001, and in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes. They also observe that numerous names and labels are used to describe sustainability in companies such as Sustainability Programs, Corporate and/or Social Responsibility Reports, and Global Citizen Reports.

The authors identified nine components of sustainability programs common to the 130 companies they examined. These were grouped into three areas: Resource Management (Solid Waste, Water Conservation); Energy Management (Energy Conservation, Renewable Energy, GHG Emission Reduction, Energy Efficient Construction, e.g., LEED); and Product Sustainability (Product Transportation, Supply Chain Audit, Product Stewardship, Life-Cycle Program). Read More

4.23.2010

EHS Auditing – A Key to Breakthrough Performance and EHS Integration

“What gets measured, gets done” is a popular saying in performance improvement circles. There is more though. Yes, true as this is, measurement—and I’ll go a step further here and say auditing—is just part of the “gets done” piece. When crafted within a context of breakthrough performance, EHS auditing and the audit function in an EHS department can be a catalyst for accelerated performance improvement and EHS integration. EHS auditing is commonly viewed as a necessary evil or burden to satisfy regulatory and legal requirements. Within this context, the results are predictable. There is little if any enthusiasm; there is a struggle; and there can be challenges with inter-rater reliability.

When EHS auditing is formulated through an organizational learning and systems thinking lens—supported by an integrated EHS management system structure—the function shifts from being summative to formative, as program evaluation professionals would say. There is a shift toward action research that fosters partnership in solving EHS challenges. Audits are viewed as opportunities to see things not previously apparent. Casual links and patterns are distinguished in a way that people can see their roles in the “organizational systems” and see possibilities to alter the system and their roles.

Read More

4.19.2010

A Multi-Dimensional Perspective for EHS, Building and Leveraging Your EHS Culture

Organizational culture is complex, and according to many experts, not well understood. EHS professionals often think about culture in terms of safety. Yet, while safety is clearly important, the topic of culture is all-encompassing.

An area that I continue to explore is how EHS departments and their professionals can impact overall organizational culture. Said another way, how can you build and leverage your EHS culture?

I recently heard Professor Ed Schein of MIT, regarded as an organizational culture pioneer, speak. The title of his lecture was, “From Managing Organizational Culture to Leading Multicultural Teams.” He discussed the ways in which his thoughts on organizational culture have evolved over the past several decades and reviewed some of the material in the soon-to-be-released 4th edition of his landmark book, Organizational Culture and Leadership.

Read More

3.26.2010

Is Your EHS Audit Program Hitting The Mark?

Auditing is a difficult subject—the term rarely conjures pleasant thoughts, and it’s often a dreaded event for the auditee. For the EHS department, it is a complex endeavor, one that EHS professionals often don’t feel they fully have a handle on as they’re presented with issues of program validity and reliability. For internal audit programs in large companies, scheduling can be a nightmare, with auditors swamped by primary-non-audit duties. While EHS departments do complete their audits and generate reports for the C-Suite, Board of Directors, and External Third Parties, the EHS audit programs I’ve observed often miss the mark.

Some of the recent EHS audit program challenges I’ve observed include: (1) integrating EHS management system audits with existing compliance audits; (2) developing procedures to close the gap between EHS program/system upgrades and the audit tools measuring them; (3) training auditors how to audit the EHS management system; (4) identifying leading indicators that can shorten the audit process or be used in site/plant self-assessment activities. Read More

3.25.2010

Use of Causal Loop Diagrams in Building High Performance EHS Teams

I have worked with several EHS departments to increase their performance and cohesiveness. In partnership, we’ve addressed performance beyond simply meeting regulatory compliance, examining ways that they can integrate EHS deeper into the organization and impact sustainability and CSR. In all of these engagements, I have started by getting the EHS management system up-to-snuff and firing on all cylinders. Beyond the EHSMS, we then focused on:

  • Team vision: developing a strong vision based in the team’s collective wisdom.
  • Communication skills: strengthening internal and external communication and generating alignment.
  • Team learning: developing mechanisms for feedback, analysis, and integration.
  • Systems thinking: strengthened skills in systems ID and mapping.

Read More